Case studies

Show the work.
Prove the outcome.

A useful case study should explain the constraint, the architecture, the migration path and the result—without inflating the story.

Historical client names below appeared publicly on the legacy OSIT website. Before launch, confirm permission, current naming and whether these stories should remain public.
Legacy portfolio / 2004

American Auto Lease

The legacy site described an eGroupware-based solution intended to help manage leads and organize daily activity.

No current performance, savings or operational claims are being inferred from the archived page.

BUSINESS NEEDOPEN BUSINESS APPLICATIONWORKFLOW + ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT
Legacy portfolio / 2004

Metropolitan Church

The legacy site described an affordable eGroupware deployment used to coordinate events and day-to-day organizational activity.

This is presented as historical context only until the engagement can be revalidated.

ORGANIZATIONAL NEEDSHARED OPEN PLATFORMEVENT + ACTIVITY COORDINATION
New case study format

SHOW THE
ARCHITECTURE.

Every future case study should document the challenge, design, stack, migration path and measurable outcome—with no invented ROI.

01 / CHALLENGE

What was constrained?

Licensing, aging infrastructure, workflow, scale, portability or operational overhead.

02 / ARCHITECTURE

What changed?

Show the system boundary, data flows, integrations and hosting model.

03 / IMPLEMENTATION

How was risk controlled?

Discovery, proof of concept, migration, validation and rollback.

04 / OUTCOME

What can be proven?

Documented cost, reliability, supportability, performance or workflow improvements.